Show Navigation

Search Results

Refine Search
Match all words
Match any word
Prints
Personal Use
Royalty-Free
Rights-Managed
(leave unchecked to
search all images)
{ 2138 images found }

Loading ()...

  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:    Thai Red Shirts, including a woman wearing a model of Thailand's Democracy Monument as a hat, line up for lunch during the Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest021.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND: A man waves the Red Shirt flag during a Red Shirt protest at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest011.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND: Red Shirt line the sidewalk in front of the Thai Constitutional Court during the Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest007.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND: Red Shirt line the sidewalk in front of the Thai Constitutional Court during the Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest006.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:  Red Shirts leades are fanned by a supporter during a press conference in front of the Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest005.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:  A boy wearing a Yingluck Shinawatra (Prime Minister of Thailand) tee shirt, attends a Red Shirt rally at the Constitutional Court in Bangkok. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest003.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:  A Thai Red Shirt, wearing a Yingluck Shinawatra (Prime Minister of Thailand) tee shirt, gestures during a Red Shirt rally at the Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest002.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:  Red Shirts leades are fanned by a supporter during a press conference in front of the Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest001.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:   A teen aged Thai Red Shirt scratches his nose with a Red Shirt noise clapper during the Red Shirt rally and protest at the Constitutional Court in Bangkok. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch. PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest026.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:  A Thai Red Shirt cheers during the Red Shirt rally and protest at the Constitutional Court in Bangkok. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest025.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND: A Thai Red Shirt with a Yingluck Shinawatra pen and photos of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and current Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra (she is Thaksin's sister) at a Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest024.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND: A Thai Red Shirt with a Yingluck Shinawatra pen and photos of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and current Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra (she is Thaksin's sister) at a Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest023.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND: A Thai Red Shirt with a Yingluck Shinawatra pen and photos of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and current Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra (she is Thaksin's sister) at a Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest022.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:   A Thai Red Shirt scratches his neck while he wears a mask of former Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra during rally and protest at the Constitutional Court in Bangkok. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch. PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest020.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:   Thai Red Shirts, including a woman wearing a model of Thailand's Democracy Monument as a hat, cheer during the Red Shirt rally and protest at the Constitutional Court in Bangkok. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest019.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:   Thai Red Shirts, including a woman wearing a model of Thailand's Democracy Monument as a hat, cheer during the Red Shirt rally and protest at the Constitutional Court in Bangkok. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest018.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:   Thai Red Shirts cheer during the Red Shirt rally and protest at the Constitutional Court in Bangkok. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch. PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest017.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:   Thai Red Shirts cheer during the Red Shirt rally and protest at the Constitutional Court in Bangkok. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch. PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest016.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:    Thai Red Shirts line up for lunch during the Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest015.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:    Thai Red Shirts line up for lunch during the Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest014.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:    Thai Red Shirts line up for lunch during the Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest013.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND: Red Shirt volunteers serve red shaved ice deserts during a Red Shirt protest at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest012.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND: A man waves the Red Shirt flag during a Red Shirt protest at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest010.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:  A woman wearing a placard with pictures of ousted Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and current Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra (and Thaksin's sister) at a Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest009.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:  A woman wearing a placard with pictures of ousted Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and current Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra (and Thaksin's sister) at a Red Shirt rally at the Thai Constitutional Court. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest008.jpg
  • 01 MAY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:  A boy wearing a Yingluck Shinawatra (Prime Minister of Thailand) tee shirt, attends a Red Shirt rally at the Constitutional Court in Bangkok. Several hundred Thai Red Shirts, members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), have been camped out at Thailand's Constitutional Court, which oversees matters related to the Thai constitution and constitutional amendment. The Red Shirts are protesting the court's decision to consider a petition regarding the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments that have been proposed by the government. The group is arguing that by considering the petition, the Court is impeding the powers of the legislative branch.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    RedShirtProtest004.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: VICTOR VIRAMONTES, national senior counsel for MALDEF at a press conference after a hearing in the US court in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing027.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: OMAR JADWAT, senior staff attorney for the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project, at a press conference after a hearing in the US court in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing017.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER walks into a press conference in her office to respond to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction066.jpg
  • 23 JANUARY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:  A court security officer reads a Bangkok newspaper under a portrait of Bhumibol Adulyadej, the King of Thailand, at the Bangkok Criminal Court Wednesday. Somyot Prueksakasemsuk, a prominent Thai magazine editor, was sentenced to 11 years imprisonment at the court Wednesday for "Lese Majeste" charges. He was arrested on April 30, 2011, and charged under article 112 of Thailand's penal code, which states that ?whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, the Queen, the Heir-apparent or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years" after the magazine he edited, "Red Power" (later changed to "The Voice of Thaksin") published two articles by Jit Pollachan, the pseudonym of Jakrapob Penkair, the exiled former spokesman of exiled fugitive former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Jakrapob, now living in Cambodia, has never been charged with any crime for what he wrote.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SomyotSentenced020.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: OMAR JADWAT, senior staff attorney for the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project, at a press conference after a hearing in the US court in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing018.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Assistant Maricopa County Attorney TOM LIDDY walks into US federal Court in Phoenix to help defend section 2B of SB1070. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year. PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing001.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER walks into a press conference in her office to respond to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction065.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: JOSE LUIS LEAL, left, and PETRA FALCONE, both from Promise AZ, (PAZ) read the US Supreme Court's ruling on SB 1070 at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday after the court ruled on a lawsuit brought against Arizona by the Obama administration. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction061.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A child riding an inflatable pool toy slides down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_028.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A pile of wrecked sleds on the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_026.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A pile of wrecked sleds on the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_025.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A person rides an inflatable pool toy down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_024.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A person comes off an inflatable pool toy while sledding down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_023.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A person comes off an inflatable pool toy while sledding down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_022.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A person rides an inflatable pool toy down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_021.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A person rides an inflatable pool toy down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_020.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People standing in front of the Shattering Silence sculpture watch sledders on the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_018.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A person rides a sled down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_015.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People slide down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court on a plastic sled. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_012.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A child riding an inflatable pool toy slides down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_010.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A child riding an inflatable pool toy slides down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_008.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People slide down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court on a plastic sled. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_007.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People slide down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court on a plastic sled. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_001.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing033.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing031.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing030.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: SALVADOR REZA, a Phoenix civil rights activists, talks about racial profiling by Phoenix law enforcement during a press conference about the enforcement of SB 1070 in Phoenx. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing026.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: SALVADOR REZA, a Phoenix civil rights activists, talks about racial profiling by Phoenix law enforcement during a press conference about the enforcement of SB 1070 in Phoenx. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing025.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: KAREN TUMLIN, managing attorney for the National Immigration Law Center, answers reporters' questions at a press conference in front of the US courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing022.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: KAREN TUMLIN, managing attorney for the National Immigration Law Center, answers reporters' questions at a press conference in front of the US courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing021.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: KAREN TUMLIN, managing attorney for the National Immigration Law Center, answers reporters' questions at a press conference in front of the US courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing019.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: A protester stands in front of the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing015.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: A protester stands in front of the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing014.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing011.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing008.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing007.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing006.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing005.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing003.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: ROSA MARIA SOTO prays and celebrates at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday after the US Supreme Court struck down most of SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction063.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: ROSA MARIA SOTO prays and celebrates at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday after the US Supreme Court struck down most of SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction062.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A child riding an inflatable pool toy slides down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_027.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A child rides a sled down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_019.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People trudge up the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court during an afternoon of sledding on the hill. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_017.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People trudge up the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court during an afternoon of sledding on the hill. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_016.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A family rides a plastic toboggan down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_014.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A child rides a sled down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_013.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A child riding an inflatable pool toy slides down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_011.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: A child riding an inflatable pool toy slides down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_009.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People slide down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court on a plastic sled. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_006.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People slide down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court on a plastic sled. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_005.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People slide down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court on a plastic sled. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_004.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People slide down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court on a plastic sled. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_003.jpg
  • 02 JANUARY 2021 - DES MOINES, IOWA: People slide down the hill below the Iowa Supreme Court on a plastic sled. The hill is one of the most popular spots in Des Moines for sledding and winter play. Hundreds of people took advantage the warmer weather and the week's record snow to spend time on the slopes around the Supreme Court and neighboring capitol. The high temperature Saturday was about 25F (-4C).     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    DSMSnowPlay_002.jpg
  • 23 JANUARY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:   SOMYOT PRUESAKASEMUK waves the "V for Victory" as he walks into Bangkok Criminal Court followed by court security Wednesday. Somyot was sentenced to 11 years imprisonment Wednesday for violations of Thailand's "Lese Majeste" laws. He was arrested on April 30, 2011, and charged under article 112 of Thailand's penal code, which states that ?whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, the Queen, the Heir-apparent or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years" after the magazine he edited, "Red Power" (later changed to "The Voice of Thaksin") published two articles by Jit Pollachan, the pseudonym of Jakrapob Penkair, the exiled former spokesman of exiled fugitive former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Jakrapob, now living in Cambodia, has never been charged with any crime for what he wrote.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SomyotSentenced007.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing034.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing032.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: JOHN J. BOUMA, chairman of Snell and Wilmer, the firm defending Arizona in the ongoing lawsuits surrounding SB 1070, talks to a reporter from UNIVISION while he walks past protesters after a hearing in Phoenix Wednesday. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing029.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: JOHN J. BOUMA, chairman of Snell and Wilmer, the firm defending Arizona in the ongoing lawsuits surrounding SB 1070, talks to reporters after a hearing in Phoenix Wednesday. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing028.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: SALVADOR REZA, a Phoenix civil rights activists, talks about racial profiling by Phoenix law enforcement during a press conference about the enforcement of SB 1070 in Phoenx. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing024.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: SALVADOR REZA, a Phoenix civil rights activists, talks about racial profiling by Phoenix law enforcement during a press conference about the enforcement of SB 1070 in Phoenx. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing023.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: KAREN TUMLIN, managing attorney for the National Immigration Law Center, answers reporters' questions at a press conference in front of the US courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing020.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Reporters wait for lawyers to come out of the US federal courthouse in Phoenix during a hearing about SB 1070. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing016.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing013.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing012.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing010.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing009.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing004.jpg
  • 21 AUGUST 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Protesters picket the US federal courthouse in Phoenix. A handful of protesters waited outside the Sandra Day O'Connor Courthouse in Phoenix Wednesday while lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) sparred with lawyers from Maricopa County and the State of Arizona over the constitutionality of section 2B of SB 1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigrant law. Most of the law was struck down by the US Supreme Court in June, but the Justices let section 2B stand pending further review. The suit is being heard in District  Judge Susan Bolton's court. It was Judge Bolton who originally struck down SB 1070 in 2010. A ruling is expected later in the year.  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070CourtHearing002.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: ROSA MARIA SOTO prays and celebrates at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday after the US Supreme Court struck down most of SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction064.jpg
  • 23 JANUARY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:   A Bangkok Criminal Court security officer (left) escorts protestors off court property after Somyot Prueksakasemsuk was sentenced on "Lese Majeste" charges Wednesday. Somyot was sentenced to 11 years imprisonment Wednesday. He was arrested on April 30, 2011, and charged under article 112 of Thailand's penal code, which states that ?whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, the Queen, the Heir-apparent or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years" after the magazine he edited, "Red Power" (later changed to "The Voice of Thaksin") published two articles by Jit Pollachan, the pseudonym of Jakrapob Penkair, the exiled former spokesman of exiled fugitive former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Jakrapob, now living in Cambodia, has never been charged with any crime for what he wrote.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SomyotSentenced034.jpg
  • 23 JANUARY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:   SOMYOT PRUESAKASEMUK waves the "V for Victory" as he walks into Bangkok Criminal Court followed by court security Wednesday. Somyot was sentenced to 11 years imprisonment Wednesday for violations of Thailand's "Lese Majeste" laws. He was arrested on April 30, 2011, and charged under article 112 of Thailand’s penal code, which states that “whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, the Queen, the Heir-apparent or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years" after the magazine he edited, "Red Power" (later changed to "The Voice of Thaksin") published two articles by Jit Pollachan, the pseudonym of Jakrapob Penkair, the exiled former spokesman of exiled fugitive former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Jakrapob, now living in Cambodia, has never been charged with any crime for what he wrote.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SomyotSentenced008.jpg
  • 23 JANUARY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:  SOMYOT PRUESAKASEMUK walks into Bangkok Criminal Court followed by court security Wednesday. Somyot was sentenced to 11 years imprisonment Wednesday for violations of Thailand's "Lese Majeste" laws. He was arrested on April 30, 2011, and charged under article 112 of Thailand’s penal code, which states that “whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, the Queen, the Heir-apparent or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years" after the magazine he edited, "Red Power" (later changed to "The Voice of Thaksin") published two articles by Jit Pollachan, the pseudonym of Jakrapob Penkair, the exiled former spokesman of exiled fugitive former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Jakrapob, now living in Cambodia, has never been charged with any crime for what he wrote.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SomyotSentenced006.jpg
  • 23 JANUARY 2013 - BANGKOK, THAILAND:   SOMYOT PRUESAKASEMUK waves the "V for Victory" as he walks into Bangkok Criminal Court followed by court security Wednesday. Somyot was sentenced to 11 years imprisonment Wednesday for violations of Thailand's "Lese Majeste" laws. He was arrested on April 30, 2011, and charged under article 112 of Thailand’s penal code, which states that “whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, the Queen, the Heir-apparent or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years" after the magazine he edited, "Red Power" (later changed to "The Voice of Thaksin") published two articles by Jit Pollachan, the pseudonym of Jakrapob Penkair, the exiled former spokesman of exiled fugitive former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Jakrapob, now living in Cambodia, has never been charged with any crime for what he wrote.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SomyotSentenced005.jpg
Next
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
x

Jack Kurtz, Photojournalist & Travel Photographer

  • Published Work
  • Photographs
    • All Galleries
    • Search
    • Cart
    • Lightbox
    • Client Area
  • Jack on Instagram
  • About
  • Contact
  • My Occasional Blog
  • Portfolios on Behance
  • Portfolio