Show Navigation

Search Results

Refine Search
Match all words
Match any word
Prints
Personal Use
Royalty-Free
Rights-Managed
(leave unchecked to
search all images)
{ 90 images found }

Loading ()...

  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction050.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   DANIEL ORTEGA, an immigration attorney in Phoenix, AZ, speaks out in support of the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn most of SB1070 Monday. Ortega was an opponent of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction034.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Immigration activists pray at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday before the US Supreme Court ruled on Arizona's immigration law, SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction014.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER walks into a press conference in her office to respond to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction065.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: JOSE LUIS LEAL, left, and PETRA FALCONE, both from Promise AZ, (PAZ) read the US Supreme Court's ruling on SB 1070 at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday after the court ruled on a lawsuit brought against Arizona by the Obama administration. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction061.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Immigration activists pray at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday before the US Supreme Court ruled on Arizona's immigration law, SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction011.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: ROSA MARIA SOTO prays and celebrates at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday after the US Supreme Court struck down most of SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction064.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: ROSA MARIA SOTO prays and celebrates at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday after the US Supreme Court struck down most of SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction062.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Protesters on the street in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest023.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   ALLISON CULVER, a support of Arizona's SB1070, shouts at opponents at the Arizona State Capitol of the law after the US Supreme Court overturned most of the law Monday. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction047.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   MARTHA PAYAN (left) celebrates in front of the Arizona state capitol after the US Supreme Court overturned most of SB1070 Monday. Many conservatives in Arizona viewed the Court's decision as a victory because it let stand one small portion of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction043.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Arizona Democratic and civil rights leaders speak in support of the Supreme Court's decision overturning most of SB1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, at a press conference Monday. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction030.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Arizona Democratic and civil rights leaders speak in support of the Supreme Court's decision overturning most of SB1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, at a press conference Monday. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction029.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Former Arizona legislator ALFREDO GUTIERREZ (left) talks to other Latino political leaders at the state capitol Monday after the US Supreme Court's ruling that overturned SB1070. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction022.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: JOSE LUIS LEAL, left, and PETRA FALCONE, both from Promise AZ, (PAZ) read the US Supreme Court's ruling on SB 1070 at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday after the court ruled on a lawsuit brought against Arizona by the Obama administration. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction016.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Immigration activists pray at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday before the US Supreme Court ruled on Arizona's immigration law, SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction012.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER walks into a press conference in her office to respond to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction066.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Protesters on the street in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest022.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  BENJAMIN CAMPOS, a naturalized US citizen and supporter of immigrants' rights, waves an American flag in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest020.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Protesters chant in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest013.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  BENJAMIN CAMPOS, a naturalized US citizen and supporter of immigrants' rights, waves an American flag in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest009.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  BENJAMIN CAMPOS, a naturalized US citizen and supporter of immigrants' rights, waves an American flag in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest008.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  BENJAMIN CAMPOS, a naturalized US citizen and supporter of immigrants' rights, waves an American flag in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest005.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: A protester stands in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest004.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction058.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction049.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   ALLISON CULVER, a support of Arizona's SB1070, shouts at opponents at the Arizona State Capitol of the law after the US Supreme Court overturned most of the law Monday. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction045.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   MARTHA PAYAN (left) and ALLISON CULVER (red shirt) celebrate and picket the Arizona state capitol after the US Supreme Court overturned most of SB1070 Monday. Many conservatives in Arizona viewed the Court's decision as a victory because it let stand one small portion of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction042.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   MARTHA PAYAN (left) and ALLISON CULVER (red shirt) celebrate and picket the Arizona state capitol after the US Supreme Court overturned most of SB1070 Monday. Many conservatives in Arizona viewed the Court's decision as a victory because it let stand one small portion of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction041.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   DANIEL ORTEGA, an immigration attorney in Phoenix, AZ, speaks out in support of the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn most of SB1070 Monday. Ortega was an opponent of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction033.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Immigration supporters picket the Arizona state capitol after the US Supreme Court overturned most of SB1070 Monday. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.       PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction031.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Maricopa County Supervisor MARY ROSE WILCOX, a long time civil rights advocate in Arizona, speaks out in response to the US Supreme Court's decision overturning most of SB1070 Monday. Wilcox was an opponent of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction026.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  State Sen. STEVE GALLARDO, left, and Maricopa County Supervisor MARY ROSE WILCOX, discuss the US Supreme's Court's decision overturning most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration bill. Both people, long time civil rights activists in Arizona, were opposed to the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction023.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  GEORGINA SANCHEZ, prays at an impromptu alter at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction007.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  GEORGINA SANCHEZ, prays at an impromptu alter at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction003.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Protesters on the street in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest024.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  A Unitarian minister joins a protest in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest014.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona State Representative ANDY BIGGS, a supporter of SB1070, responds to the US Supreme Court's decision overturning most of the law Monday. Biggs said he viewed the Court's decision as a victory because it let stand one small portion of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction060.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction057.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction053.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction051.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Children stand in front of Arizona Democratic and civil rights leaders during a press conference in support of the Supreme Court's decision overturning most of SB1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, at a press conference Monday. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction038.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Children stand in front of Arizona Democratic and civil rights leaders during a press conference in support of the Supreme Court's decision overturning most of SB1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, at a press conference Monday. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction037.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   DANIEL ORTEGA, an immigration attorney in Phoenix, AZ, speaks out in support of the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn most of SB1070 Monday. Ortega was an opponent of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction035.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Immigration activists pray at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday before the US Supreme Court ruled on Arizona's immigration law, SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction015.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: GEORGINA SANCHEZ, prays at an impromptu alter at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction009.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: ROSA MARIA SOTO prays and celebrates at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday after the US Supreme Court struck down most of SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction063.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  ERIKA OVALLE leads chants in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest021.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  BENJAMIN CAMPOS, a naturalized US citizen and supporter of immigrants' rights, waves an American flag in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest019.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  BENJAMIN CAMPOS, a naturalized US citizen and supporter of immigrants' rights, waves an American flag in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest018.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   ORLANDO ARENAS (left) and ERIKA OVALLE lead chants in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest016.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   ORLANDO ARENAS (left) and ERIKA OVALLE lead chants in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest015.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   LAURENT TAILLEFER (right), ANDREA BEGAY and other immigration supporters line the street in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest010.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  ATLI MEXITA chants on the street in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest002.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction059.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction056.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction055.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction052.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction048.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   ALLISON CULVER, a support of Arizona's SB1070, shouts at opponents at the Arizona State Capitol of the law after the US Supreme Court overturned most of the law Monday. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction046.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   MARTHA PAYAN (left) celebrates in front of the Arizona state capitol after the US Supreme Court overturned most of SB1070 Monday. Many conservatives in Arizona viewed the Court's decision as a victory because it let stand one small portion of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction044.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   MARTHA PAYAN (left) and ALLISON CULVER (red shirt) celebrate and picket the Arizona state capitol after the US Supreme Court overturned most of SB1070 Monday. Many conservatives in Arizona viewed the Court's decision as a victory because it let stand one small portion of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction040.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Arizona Democratic and civil rights leaders speak in support of the Supreme Court's decision overturning most of SB1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, at a press conference Monday. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction036.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Arizona State Senator STEVE GALLARDO, speaks out in favor of the US Supreme Court's decision overturning most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration bill. Gallardo was an outspoken opponent of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction028.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Arizona State Senator STEVE GALLARDO, speaks out in favor of the US Supreme Court's decision overturning most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration bill. Gallardo was an outspoken opponent of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction027.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Maricopa County Supervisor MARY ROSE WILCOX, a long time civil rights advocate in Arizona, speaks out in response to the US Supreme Court's decision overturning most of SB1070 Monday. Wilcox was an opponent of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction025.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Maricopa County Supervisor MARY ROSE WILCOX, a long time civil rights advocate in Arizona, speaks out in response to the US Supreme Court's decision overturning most of SB1070 Monday. Wilcox was an opponent of the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction024.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Former Arizona legislator ALFREDO GUTIERREZ (left) talks to other Latino political leaders at the state capitol Monday after the US Supreme Court's ruling that overturned SB1070. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction021.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  GEORGINA SANCHEZ, prays at an impromptu alter at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction020.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: PATRICIA ROSAS, left, and GUSTAVO CRUZ, pray after the US Supreme Court ruled on US v. Arizona and Arizona's SB1070 at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction019.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: PETRA FALCONE, from Promise AZ (PAZ) talks to immigration lawyers about the US Supreme Court's ruling on SB1070 at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction017.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Immigration activists pray at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday before the US Supreme Court ruled on Arizona's immigration law, SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction010.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Immigration activists pray at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday before the US Supreme Court ruled on Arizona's immigration law, SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction008.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  GEORGINA SANCHEZ, prays at an impromptu alter at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction006.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: GEORGINA SANCHEZ, and other immigration activists light candles at an impromptu alter at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction001.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ: GEORGINA SANCHEZ, and other immigration activists light candles at an impromptu alter at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction002.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   Protesters chant in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest012.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   LAURENT TAILLEFER (right), ANDREA BEGAY and other immigration supporters line the street in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest011.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  BENJAMIN CAMPOS, a naturalized US citizen and supporter of immigrants' rights, waves an American flag in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest007.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  BENJAMIN CAMPOS, a naturalized US citizen and supporter of immigrants' rights, waves an American flag in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest006.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  BENJAMIN CAMPOS, a naturalized US citizen and supporter of immigrants' rights, waves an American flag in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.     PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest003.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Arizona Governor JAN BREWER responds to the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned most of SB 1070, the state's tough anti-immigration bill, duing a press conference Monday. Brewer said the state won a major victory in the court's ruling because a narrow portion of the law was allowed to stand. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction054.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  An anti-immigration activist pickets the Arizona state capitol after the US Supreme Court over turned SB1070 Monday. He said he supported the law. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.      PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction039.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Immigration activists pray at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday before the US Supreme Court ruled on Arizona's immigration law, SB1070. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ  PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction018.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   PETRA FALCONE, from Promise AZ (PAZ) checks her smart phone to see the US Supreme Court's ruling on SB1070 at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with. PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction013.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  GEORGINA SANCHEZ, prays at an impromptu alter at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction004.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   ORLANDO ARENAS (left) and ERIKA OVALLE lead chants in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.    PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest017.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:   ATLI MEXITA stands next to a banner she placed in front of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices in central Phoenix Monday. About 100 immigration supporters held a protest against ICE and continued deportations by the Obama administration. Protesters also celebrated the US Supreme Court decision to overturn most of SB1070, Arizona's tough anti-immigration law.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    PHXImmigrationProtest001.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  Immigration supporters picket the Arizona state capitol after the US Supreme Court overturned most of SB1070 Monday. The case, US v. Arizona, determined whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 was constitutional. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.       PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction032.jpg
  • 25 JUNE 2012 - PHOENIX, AZ:  GEORGINA SANCHEZ, prays at an impromptu alter at the Arizona State Capitol in Phoenix, AZ, Monday. The lawsuit, US v. Arizona, determines whether or not Arizona's tough anti-immigration law, popularly known as SB1070 is constitutional. Among other things, the law requires police officers to check the immigration status of anyone whom they arrest, allows police to stop and arrest anyone whom they believe to be an illegal immigrant, makes it a crime for someone to be in the state without valid immigration papers, and makes it a crime to apply for or hold a job in Arizona without proper papers. The federal government sued Arizona because it believes the law is invalid because it is trumped by federal immigration laws. The court struck down most of the law but left one section standing, the section authorizing local police agencies to check the immigration status of people they come into contact with.   PHOTO BY JACK KURTZ
    SB1070Reaction005.jpg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
x

Jack Kurtz, Photojournalist & Travel Photographer

  • Published Work
  • Photographs
    • All Galleries
    • Search
    • Cart
    • Lightbox
    • Client Area
  • Jack on Instagram
  • About
  • Contact
  • My Occasional Blog
  • Portfolios on Behance
  • Portfolio